Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Flyers trade Lukacevic for Andrew Alberts
Philadelphia Flyers > Forum > General Flyers Discussion
Pages: 1, 2
mchrissy77
QUOTE
Andrew Alberts has been traded to Philadelphia for Ned Lukacevic and a conditional 2009 fourth-round pick. If Alberts re-signs with Philly, the fourth-rounder becomes a third-round pick.

Article

Stats
The Rifle27
ph34r.gif
propp16
First Gauthier, now we are trading the people we got for Gauthier. Heh.

What is the general consensus on Alberts? I'm guessing he's an ok stopgap solution. I think he's making $1.25 mil this year. Found this on a Bruins blog:
QUOTE
Andrew Alberts was a very consistent defensemen last season, and even though he doesn't have anything particularly special to offer (like Chara and Ference) he is worth about a million and half. I expect Alberts to average 2 goals and 15 assists in each of the next two seasons.

The only thing that worries me is that he missed a lot of time last year because of a concussion.
KClark036
He'll give our defense some much needed grit that's for sure. Hopefully he takes Kukkonen's spot.
FlyersFanTN
Looks like its about time to ship kukkonen outta here.
Flyersfan 18
I'm interested to see what Steven's is going to do with the third pair.

Will this guy be dressed for tonight?
KClark036
QUOTE (Flyersfan 18 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:37 PM) *
I'm interested to see what Steven's is going to do with the third pair.

Will this guy be dressed for tonight?

I doubt it since he was trade like 30 minutes ago, but Boston is a short plane ride from Philly.
Flyersfan 18
QUOTE (KClark036 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:41 PM) *
I doubt it since he was trade like 30 minutes ago, but Boston is a short plane ride from Philly.


That's what I was thinking.
flyersfan597
QUOTE (FlyersFanTN @ Oct 13 2008, 12:36 PM) *
Looks like its about time to ship kukkonen outta here.


I doubt they even think of trading Kukkonen until Parent and/or Jones are healthy. He is now back to being the 7th defensemen. Even then Kukkonen may not be moved. Depending on the cap situation, they may decide to hang on to him for the rest of the season even if he would be the 8th defensemen, you can never have too many defensemen going into the playoffs.
Kappy
At least Homer didn't sell the farm for this guy. 1 NHL goal and a career minus. If he does any better than the previous panic signings/trades (Fitzpatrick, Vandermeer, Modry) I'm okay with this. It would ease Homer's job though if Stevens just got over his Lasse hate and play him.
propp16
QUOTE (flyersfan597 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:44 PM) *
I doubt they even think of trading Kukkonen until Parent and/or Jones are healthy. He is now back to being the 7th defensemen. Even then Kukkonen may not be moved. Depending on the cap situation, they may decide to hang on to him for the rest of the season even if he would be the 8th defensemen, you can never have too many defensemen going into the playoffs.

I'm not 100% positive but, given the salary situation, I think someone will have to go when both Parent and Jones come back. Unless big happens with Kukkonen's development -- and I am starting to doubt that at this point (though he still needs more time to prove himself) -- it may be him. The playoffs are too far away to even consider at this point. If the Flyers need someone and the AHLers haven't developed enough yet, I guess they'll worry about making another move down the stretch.
flyersfan9
hopefully this helps...
propp16
QUOTE (Kappy @ Oct 13 2008, 12:47 PM) *
At least Homer didn't sell the farm for this guy. 1 NHL goal and a career minus. If he does any better than the previous panic signings/trades (Fitzpatrick, Vandermeer, Modry) I'm okay with this. It would ease Homer's job though if Stevens just got over his Lasse hate and play him.


Nearly every other defenseman >>> Rory Fitzpatrick. That's just my opinion, though. We'll see how he stacks up against Vandy and Modry in time, though. The good thing is, I think Alberts will probably be relegated to a third pairing right off the bat whereas it seemed that Modry and Vandermeer were put into more important roles.
FlyersGirl
I like this move, but please don't re-sign him and give up our 3rd.
flyersfan597
QUOTE (propp16 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:49 PM) *
I'm not 100% positive but, given the salary situation, I think someone will have to go when both Parent and Jones come back. Unless big happens with Kukkonen's development -- and I am starting to doubt that at this point (though he still needs more time to prove himself) -- it may be him. The playoffs are too far away to even consider at this point. If the Flyers need someone and the AHLers haven't developed enough yet, I guess they'll worry about making another move down the stretch.


Yes, depending on the cap situation, Kukkonen would be the first to go. But we will also have to wait and see how they approach Sbisa & Parent. Does Sbisa stay the entire season or go back to juniors? And when Parent comes back will they start him out in the AHl since he is on a 2 way contract to get him back into game shape?
Kappy
QUOTE (FlyersGirl @ Oct 13 2008, 07:54 PM) *
I like this move, but please don't re-sign him and give up our 3rd.


I think he's just a quick fill-in and won't be re-signed. A third rounder in next year's deep draft would be overpaying IMO.
propp16
QUOTE (FlyersGirl @ Oct 13 2008, 12:54 PM) *
I like this move, but please don't re-sign him and give up our 3rd.

How do you think he'll be paired? If he's got some grit and is more defensive-minded, I'd imagine he'd play with Eminger, right?
propp16
QUOTE (flyersfan597 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:55 PM) *
Yes, depending on the cap situation, Kukkonen would be the first to go. But we will also have to wait and see how they approach Sbisa & Parent. Does Sbisa stay the entire season or go back to juniors? And when Parent comes back will they start him out in the AHl since he is on a 2 way contract to get him back into game shape?

Yeah, I think I'm getting too anxious with Parent. Since Sbisa's up here, I'm already expecting Parent to step right back into the NHL. I need to step back from that.
jefjd
I like it. If not for a dreadful 06-07 campaign his +/- would be a lot better.

Hopefully he gets here in time to play tonight.
G-Force
We need the depth right now, so it's not a terrible move.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=252537&...s=headlines_nhl

FlyersFan426
QUOTE (propp16 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:58 PM) *
Yeah, I think I'm getting too anxious with Parent. Since Sbisa's up here, I'm already expecting Parent to step right back into the NHL. I need to step back from that.


You aren't the only one. Quite a few people (including me) keep saying "when Parent & Jones come back" as if we expect Ryan to jump right back on the NHL roster. Though, I have said he may need time in the AHL to shake the rust, it won't be for long. Once he shakes it, I'm sure they'll bring him back up because he did work hard in the off season, & Holmgren said he "turned the corner" & was looking like he was top six ready, & I highly doubt he'll forget what he picked up in the off season. I think it'll all depend on how he appears to look in practice, heck they may even try him in one game, to see if he can handle it; if not, he'll go back to the Phantoms to shake the rust. We'll have to wait & see!

QUOTE (jefjd @ Oct 13 2008, 01:03 PM) *
I like it. If not for a dreadful 06-07 campaign his +/- would be a lot better.

Hopefully he gets here in time to play tonight.


I agree!
Flyersfan018
Not bad. He'll be a pretty good fill in until we get healthy.
flyersgirl918
This totally crushed my day. sad.gif sad.gif sad.gif

But I think the move is good.
FlyersGirl
QUOTE (flyersfan597 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:55 PM) *
Yes, depending on the cap situation, Kukkonen would be the first to go. But we will also have to wait and see how they approach Sbisa & Parent. Does Sbisa stay the entire season or go back to juniors? And when Parent comes back will they start him out in the AHl since he is on a 2 way contract to get him back into game shape?

I don't necessarily think Kukkonen would be the first one to go. Defensive depth is important and it would be foolish to trade someone making so little, IMO. I wouldn't be shocked to see a forward moved especially if Giroux proves to be ready.

QUOTE (propp16 @ Oct 13 2008, 12:56 PM) *
How do you think he'll be paired? If he's got some grit and is more defensive-minded, I'd imagine he'd play with Eminger, right?

Yes, I think that's the likely pairing we'll see.
Gagne12
I hope he does good for us. We really didn't move anyone special for him.
flyersgirl918
QUOTE (Gagne12 @ Oct 13 2008, 01:30 PM) *
I hope he does good for us. We really didn't move anyone special for him.

He was special to me but for a totally different reason. tongue.gif
Dave
I quite like this deal, too.

Depth and a little bit more reassurance on the latter part of the D pairings. A big guy who should add some grit and presence at D.

QUOTE
"When commenting on the trade that sent Andrew Alberts to Philadelphia, Claude Julien mentioned that the defenseman was better during camp at rebounding from errors than he had been before.

"There was a time where after he made a few mistakes, that would push him out for the rest of the game," Julien said. "I thought he'd been doing a great job of bouncing back and finishing strong. That was a positive.

"But the fact that Alberts was still making those mistakes in the first place was one reason why the Bruins shipped out the 27-year-old ex-Boston College star."


The last part sounds a bit worrying though.
FlyersGirl
Comment from a Bruins fan on HF:

QUOTE
Alberts is a terrific skater for his size but he doesn't know if he's coming or going. Takes bad angles to the attacker and lets attackers beat him wide. Gets confused easily and tends to make bad decisions with the puck when pressured. Can deliver punishing hits. Will drop the gloves...and get his you know what kicked. Decent on the PK. No offensive skills. He has the skills to be a top defensive defensemen but his brain hasn't gotten it and may never will.
WillDaBeast
Good trade. Keep this guy all season and push Jones out the door. Release him in the offseason and replace him with Parent next year.
Dave
QUOTE (WillDaBeast @ Oct 13 2008, 06:39 PM) *
Good trade. Keep this guy all season and push Jones out the door. Release him in the offseason and replace him with Parent next year.


How come you want Jones out?
WillDaBeast
QUOTE (Dave @ Oct 13 2008, 01:43 PM) *
How come you want Jones out?


That 2.75 million dollar cap hit. Jones is not a special player he can be replaced with much more affordable options that are just as good as he is. Alberts would be better for the team anyway, he is a good physical presence and adds a more important dimension that Jones doesn't.
Dave
QUOTE (WillDaBeast @ Oct 13 2008, 07:00 PM) *
That 2.75 million dollar cap hit. Jones is not a special player he can be replaced with much more affordable options that are just as good as he is. Alberts would be better for the team anyway, he is a good physical presence and adds a more important dimension that Jones doesn't.


Fair enough. Who would you say is better and more affordable?

It sounds like Alberts makes a lot more mistakes than what Jones would though.
WillDaBeast
QUOTE (Dave @ Oct 13 2008, 02:03 PM) *
Fair enough. Who would you say is better and more affordable?

It sounds like Alberts makes a lot more mistakes than what Jones would though.


Well we can't truly judge Alberts until we see him play for us. He might play very well for us he may surprise us and be as big a disgrace as Modry was. If we use him on the 3rd pairing I think he will be great but if we try to use him on the 2nd pairing he may have some troubles.

Overall I haven't seen him much but I think he is right in the same area as Jones. Even if Alberts ends up playing terribly I would still like to see Jones moved out and a cheaper guy in. Ratchuk maybe given a shot next season or another one of our good AHL defenders like Bartulis. If not them then look at one of the many cheap underrated FA and steal another Vaananan. Only costs us 1 million.
Dave
QUOTE (WillDaBeast @ Oct 13 2008, 07:15 PM) *
Well we can't truly judge Alberts until we see him play for us. He might play very well for us he may surprise us and be as big a disgrace as Modry was. If we use him on the 3rd pairing I think he will be great but if we try to use him on the 2nd pairing he may have some troubles.

Overall I haven't seen him much but I think he is right in the same area as Jones. Even if Alberts ends up playing terribly I would still like to see Jones moved out and a cheaper guy in. Ratchuk maybe given a shot next season or another one of our good AHL defenders like Bartulis. If not them then look at one of the many cheap underrated FA and steal another Vaananan. Only costs us 1 million.


That's true. I guess Coburn was kind of in the same position before he played in his first game with us. Now look at him... I agree that Alberts has to be on the 3rd line though, like you said, the 2nd would be risky.

I haven't seen Vaananan play yet. Is he quite solid?
propp16
QUOTE (Dave @ Oct 13 2008, 02:20 PM) *
I haven't seen Vaananan play yet. Is he quite solid?

Time will tell but, so far, I'm finding myself to be a huge Vaananen fan and I think he may be the best signing we made in the offseason. I think Vaananen is what Homer wanted Modry and Vandy to be. I think I'm leading the Vaany fan club.
propp16
Tim P's article on Alberts: Link

I forgot it was Hartnell that gave him a concussion.
Dave
QUOTE (propp16 @ Oct 13 2008, 07:51 PM) *
Tim P's article on Alberts: Link

I forgot it was Hartnell that gave him a concussion.


That was an incredibly hard hit to the head, as well. Was that the one Hartnell was suspended for?
WillDaBeast
QUOTE (Dave @ Oct 13 2008, 02:54 PM) *
That was an incredibly hard hit to the head, as well. Was that the one Hartnell was suspended for?


Yup. Basically Hartnell hurt him and Jones took out his friend. He should fit in well. He can play like the Waterboy, just look around and see the faces that hurt him and picture those goes heads on the opposition laugh.gif

Flyersrule25
Well just think about the last time Homer traded for a big, decent skating defenseman...He is now a star. I am talking about Coburn if no one picked up on it. I think this move could be a good one if this guy develops like Coby did.
KClark036
Coburn and Alberts are two different types of players. Coburn was billed as a smooth skating, offensive minded, puck moving defensemen, which he has become, while Alberts is a physical, stay at home, defensive defensemen.
tina78
Seems like a so so move.

I rather have Kuks out than Sbisa. I would assume Kuks would get the scratch (for Alberts) and Sbisa would be kept in.
Jordan
once our injured players come back we will get rid of alberts
FlyersFan426
QUOTE (tina78 @ Oct 13 2008, 04:49 PM) *
Seems like a so so move.

I rather have Kuks out than Sbisa. I would assume Kuks would get the scratch (for Alberts) and Sbisa would be kept in.


I would say that's a safe bet considering they moved Luca up to second pairing with Coburn & dropped Eminger down to third pairing with Kukkonen, & Kukkonen only had 8 mins of ice time the other night in the Rangers game.
Dave
QUOTE (KClark036 @ Oct 13 2008, 08:28 PM) *
Coburn and Alberts are two different types of players. Coburn was billed as a smooth skating, offensive minded, puck moving defensemen, which he has become, while Alberts is a physical, stay at home, defensive defensemen.


True, but Coburn was playing in a system which didn't suit him, he came here and hit it off. I think what Flyers25 is trying to say is given the opportunity, Alberts could do well as the stay at home defensemen. But then there is his mistakes that's been talked about, hence why Boston got rid.
FiveHoleFrankie
You guys are so quick to ship our players out. I'm just curious, what's with all the Kukko hate? Also, i think you should treat the Alberts signing just as it is...a band aid, not more, nothing less. I don't have high expecations from this guy.
philly fan 27
i like this move. alberts will add some much needed toughness to the backend. also, this gives kukko a chance to get familar with the bench
FlyerGuy
QUOTE (Kappy @ Oct 13 2008, 11:47 AM) *
At least Homer didn't sell the farm for this guy. 1 NHL goal and a career minus. If he does any better than the previous panic signings/trades (Fitzpatrick, Vandermeer, Modry) I'm okay with this. It would ease Homer's job though if Stevens just got over his Lasse hate and play him.

I think you should get over your love for Lasse and accept the fact that he's not a good dman. Without the puck he's ok, but with the puck he's absolutely horrible.
Kappy
QUOTE (FlyerGuy @ Oct 14 2008, 05:41 PM) *
I think you should get over your love for Lasse and accept the fact that he's not a good dman. Without the puck he's ok, but with the puck he's absolutely horrible.


I don't think anyone has ever claimed he's some Lemieux with the puck. If that's what you're expecting, of course you think he's horrible. He's a defensive d-man who's job isn't playmaking. He's the best shot blocker on the team and had the lowest giveaway ratio of our d-men last year so it's not like he's losing the puck either. He's steady and deserves a chance.
Meccadon123
QUOTE (Kappy @ Oct 14 2008, 10:48 AM) *
I don't think anyone has ever claimed he's some Lemieux with the puck. If that's what you're expecting, of course you think he's horrible. He's a defensive d-man who's job isn't playmaking. He's the best shot blocker on the team and had the lowest giveaway ratio of our d-men last year so it's not like he's losing the puck either. He's steady and deserves a chance.


While you may be correct, he would probably have the lowest give away ratio because he touches the puck a lot less. 25% of his give away ratio was the ONE give away to AO right in front of the net that cost us a goal.
FlyerGuy
QUOTE (Kappy @ Oct 14 2008, 09:48 AM) *
I don't think anyone has ever claimed he's some Lemieux with the puck. If that's what you're expecting, of course you think he's horrible. He's a defensive d-man who's job isn't playmaking. He's the best shot blocker on the team and had the lowest giveaway ratio of our d-men last year so it's not like he's losing the puck either. He's steady and deserves a chance.


Giveaway ratio? You don't need to look on nhl.com's stats to know that he's horrible with the puck. Just watch him play. He makes very poor decisions time after time. You don't need a stats page to realize that. If shot blocking is his big upside, big deal. If he can't get the puck out of the zone, that's a big problem.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.