QUOTE (Flyerfan52 @ Aug 26 2008, 09:58 PM)

If he outplays one, that guy could probably use more seasoning in the minors anyway.
That will be fine if that one player is Parent, simply because he has the two-way contract to be moved to the Phantoms without the chance of losing him. However, if that one player is Vaananen, Eminger, or Kukkonen, I have a problem with that. None of them have a two-way contract and will need to clear waivers to be moved to the Phantoms. And imo, none of those three would clear waivers if placed on them. So, that means losing a younger defenseman for a guy who's 31 years old, and has never been a solid defensive defenseman. I don't like that outcome. And other teams realize the situation that the Flyers are currently in. So, if the Flyers choose to trade that one player who Berard outplays(if it's Eminger, Vaan, or Kukks), it's unlikely that they'll receive proper value in return for them. I don't like that outcome either.
QUOTE
It looks like Hatcher and Rathje are going to be long term injured and we could use another pressure tested player back there.
Yes, it does look like Hatcher will go on LTIR. And maybe the Flyers could use another "pressure tested" player back there. However, I don't believe for a second that that player is Berard. Not by any stretch of the imagination. If they need anyone at all back there, it's a SOLID defensive defenseman. And Berard is simply NOT that type of defenseman.
Again, as I said, I have no problem with this invite. But that's only because no contract has been given to him yet. I respect Berard for what he's been able to overcome in his career. That's great. But I don't feel he's a player that this organization needs at all at this point.
QUOTE (Flyerfan52 @ Aug 26 2008, 10:02 PM)

I was prescribed steroids for an allergy. They aren't always taken to try to get an edge in competition.
Those types of steroids are corticosteroids, not anabolic steroids. BIG difference there.