Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Is Simon Gagne Available?
Philadelphia Flyers > Forum > General Flyers Discussion
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
OilerFan
QUOTE (hesh @ Jul 30 2008, 05:51 PM) *
But seriously I realize since you guys watch mostly the Eastern Conference you don't really know a lot about the west other than the obvious guys.


Don't go insulting the hockey knowledge of the posters on this board. I've posted here a long time. Firstly because I like the Flyers, but I've stayed because regular posters here are some of the most intelligent hockey fans going (and not just about their own team). I actually post/read this message board more so than the Oilers message board.

QUOTE (hesh @ Jul 31 2008, 11:08 AM) *
I don't know I like the All black jerseys they look really cool. Reminds me a bit of those Baltimore ravens jerseys. But I agree that the white versions are crap.


What kind of Oilers fan are you when you don't even know the jerseys are dark blue and not black blink.gif I agree both new designs are crap.


As for the trade proposal... you are correct in suggesting you are not good at trade ideas. Firstly, the Flyers would not consider trading Gagne at this point. If he doesn't recuperate well and doesn't live up to expectations by say trade deadline/end of season maybe. The idea of trading Penner or Cogliano is ridiculous from an Oilers perspective. Penner showed signs last year of why they wanted him to begin with. I see lots of potential for him to develop into a real good power forward, he's young and needs some time to develop and find a consistent game. As for Cogliano, are you nuts... trade away one of our premier young guns with nothing but upside potential. Look what he did in his rookie season along with Gagner and Nilsson.

I like the Oilers roster just the way it is going into the season. I admit I do see the potential need for a sniper to play with Hemsky but time will tell. Lots of changes and the need to see how players chemistry works this year.

As for the Flyers and Gagne.... if he comes back and plays like he can... the Briere/Gagner combination could be lethal. They proved they have chemistry together on the ice last season.

propp16
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 4 2008, 01:17 PM) *
Don't go insulting the hockey knowledge of the posters on this board. I've posted here a long time. Firstly because I like the Flyers, but I've stayed because regular posters here are some of the most intelligent hockey fans going (and not just about their own team). I actually post/read this message board more so than the Oilers message board.


You're cool, OilerFan. Just thought I'd point that out.
Dave
QUOTE (propp16 @ Aug 4 2008, 06:29 PM) *
You're cool, OilerFan. Just thought I'd point that out.


I'll second that!
Retire#27
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 4 2008, 01:17 PM) *
Don't go insulting the hockey knowledge of the posters on this board. I've posted here a long time. Firstly because I like the Flyers, but I've stayed because regular posters here are some of the most intelligent hockey fans going (and not just about their own team). I actually post/read this message board more so than the Oilers message board.



What kind of Oilers fan are you when you don't even know the jerseys are dark blue and not black blink.gif I agree both new designs are crap.


As for the trade proposal... you are correct in suggesting you are not good at trade ideas. Firstly, the Flyers would not consider trading Gagne at this point. If he doesn't recuperate well and doesn't live up to expectations by say trade deadline/end of season maybe. The idea of trading Penner or Cogliano is ridiculous from an Oilers perspective. Penner showed signs last year of why they wanted him to begin with. I see lots of potential for him to develop into a real good power forward, he's young and needs some time to develop and find a consistent game. As for Cogliano, are you nuts... trade away one of our premier young guns with nothing but upside potential. Look what he did in his rookie season along with Gagner and Nilsson.

I like the Oilers roster just the way it is going into the season. I admit I do see the potential need for a sniper to play with Hemsky but time will tell. Lots of changes and the need to see how players chemistry works this year.

As for the Flyers and Gagne.... if he comes back and plays like he can... the Briere/Gagner combination could be lethal. They proved they have chemistry together on the ice last season.

I like your sig.

All good points. Penner came of age in Anaheim. When he started using his size more, he started to realize his potential. I think he had a sketchy work ethic early on, but seems to have found his purpose. Larger players usually hit their prime a year or two later than regular players (barring injury of course). As for Cogliano, I actually saw him play for Team Ontario a few years ago and he was very impressive. He was also an important "cog" wink.gif in both of Canada's WJC runs. I don't see his size as a detriment because he plays beyond it. When I saw him, he looked like a young Pavel Bure. I honestly wouldn't part with either.
OilerFan
QUOTE (propp16 @ Aug 4 2008, 11:29 AM) *
You're cool, OilerFan. Just thought I'd point that out.



QUOTE (Dave @ Aug 4 2008, 11:31 AM) *
I'll second that!


Thanks but I just stated the facts and the truth! wub.gif
hesh
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 4 2008, 01:17 PM) *
Don't go insulting the hockey knowledge of the posters on this board. I've posted here a long time. Firstly because I like the Flyers, but I've stayed because regular posters here are some of the most intelligent hockey fans going (and not just about their own team). I actually post/read this message board more so than the Oilers message board.



What kind of Oilers fan are you when you don't even know the jerseys are dark blue and not black blink.gif I agree both new designs are crap.


As for the trade proposal... you are correct in suggesting you are not good at trade ideas. Firstly, the Flyers would not consider trading Gagne at this point. If he doesn't recuperate well and doesn't live up to expectations by say trade deadline/end of season maybe. The idea of trading Penner or Cogliano is ridiculous from an Oilers perspective. Penner showed signs last year of why they wanted him to begin with. I see lots of potential for him to develop into a real good power forward, he's young and needs some time to develop and find a consistent game. As for Cogliano, are you nuts... trade away one of our premier young guns with nothing but upside potential. Look what he did in his rookie season along with Gagner and Nilsson.

I like the Oilers roster just the way it is going into the season. I admit I do see the potential need for a sniper to play with Hemsky but time will tell. Lots of changes and the need to see how players chemistry works this year.

As for the Flyers and Gagne.... if he comes back and plays like he can... the Briere/Gagner combination could be lethal. They proved they have chemistry together on the ice last season.

Are you all right? I realize they are not black I said that by accident but I'm talking about the style. I don't think it is that ridiculous to trade penner or cogliano. I feel that getting simon gagne would be great for the franchise and he would have great chemistry with hemsky and Sam Gagner. To get a proven 40 goal scorer I would trade either of them.

But seriously are you all right? You seem a little ticked off. I didn't mean to insult anyone I just figured that not everybody has Center ice. It is pretty expensive(well not that expensive but it is for me)

And here is the ravens jersey in case you havent seen it:http://image.bizrate.com/resize?sq=160&uid=718184730&mid=141021
ibanez
QUOTE (propp16 @ Jul 30 2008, 03:54 PM) *
How do people with under 200 posts keep starting topics?



^^^^^^^^^^^^
This
bewareofBRIERE
QUOTE (hesh @ Jul 30 2008, 01:34 PM) *
I like the guy and thought that he might be available because of his injury. Would something like.......... I don't really know what I would want to give up but I'm just interested. I would probably give up a guy like dustin penner or andrew cogliano plus one prospect(maybe rob schremp I don't know Im not good at these trade ideas) and a late round pick for him. I would think it's a fair deal but you might disagree.

I would think he would love playing in canada as he has thrived in a pretty good hockey market in philly.

Obviously I'm not the gm but I'd like to see him in an oilers jersey someday and just wanna know if he is still part of the plans on this team(according to holmgren)

i would do that trade, i'm not gags biggest fan and his injuries concern me. Cogliano has huge upside, the defenseman prospect you have (i forget his name, something really french) is supposed to have loads of potential, and draft picks are always good to have. so something like that for gags would really benefit us IMO.
OilerFan
QUOTE (Retire#27 @ Jul 30 2008, 01:59 PM) *
Are you questioning the power of this great message board software? unsure.gif


I sure am blink.gif Besides the "posting" limit question... how do people get to be advanced member ratings with under 200 posts????
OilerFan
QUOTE (hesh @ Aug 4 2008, 12:43 PM) *
Are you all right? I realize they are not black I said that by accident but I'm talking about the style. I don't think it is that ridiculous to trade penner or cogliano. I feel that getting simon gagne would be great for the franchise and he would have great chemistry with hemsky and Sam Gagner. To get a proven 40 goal scorer I would trade either of them.

But seriously are you all right? You seem a little ticked off. I didn't mean to insult anyone I just figured that not everybody has Center ice. It is pretty expensive(well not that expensive but it is for me)

And here is the ravens jersey in case you havent seen it:http://image.bizrate.com/resize?sq=160&uid=718184730&mid=141021


If you meant blue then say blue or use the edit button.... you wrote it not me.

No doubt I also like Gagne but as I stated I wouldn't trade those assets for him at this point in time. The Flyers would not consider trading Gagne at this point in time either. You are entitled to your opinion but we are also entitled to disagree with you -- which I do.

Yes, I was ticked off. I was ticked off because you DID offend some posters on this board. I was doubly ticked off because you claim to be a fellow Oilers fan and I won't put up with same insulting anyone (even just one or two) on this board. Especially a newbie with rep on this board. Earn your stripes here then you are allowed some latitude.

I've seen the Ravens jersey. I was public knowledge that Laforge tried to redesign the Oilers new jerseys based on it -- nothing new there.
hesh
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 4 2008, 08:06 PM) *
If you meant blue then say blue or use the edit button.... you wrote it not me.

No doubt I also like Gagne but as I stated I wouldn't trade those assets for him at this point in time. The Flyers would not consider trading Gagne at this point in time either. You are entitled to your opinion but we are also entitled to disagree with you -- which I do.

Yes, I was ticked off. I was ticked off because you DID offend some posters on this board. I was doubly ticked off because you claim to be a fellow Oilers fan and I won't put up with same insulting anyone (even just one or two) on this board. Especially a newbie with rep on this board. Earn your stripes here then you are allowed some latitude.

I've seen the Ravens jersey. I was public knowledge that Laforge tried to redesign the Oilers new jerseys based on it -- nothing new there.

I would make that trade in a heart beat. I like those home jersey. I don't think I offended anyone but sorry if I did.
FiveHoleFrankie
QUOTE (hesh @ Aug 5 2008, 03:08 PM) *
I would make that trade in a heart beat. I like those home jersey. I don't think I offended anyone but sorry if I did.


You're fine...don't worry about it. Welcome to the boards (belated i know).
FlyersGirl
If the Flyers traded Gagne they probably wouldn't have any interest in Penner or Cogs because the Flyers are fine at forward depth. They need defense above all else. I don't think the Oilers and Flyers would be an ideal match at this point.
hesh
QUOTE (FlyersGirl @ Aug 5 2008, 06:22 PM) *
If the Flyers traded Gagne they probably wouldn't have any interest in Penner or Cogs because the Flyers are fine at forward depth. They need defense above all else. I don't think the Oilers and Flyers would be an ideal match at this point.

Meh..... I guess. The oilers don't have much depth at D either.
Brophy
Id take Rolo for Gagne.
Retire#27
QUOTE (Brophy @ Aug 7 2008, 11:55 AM) *
Id take Rolo for Gagne.

Maybe Rolo + a massage table for Gagne, but not straight up.
youngdaniel48
QUOTE (Brophy @ Aug 7 2008, 11:55 AM) *
Id take Rolo for Gagne.


i wouldnt do that...roloson is 38 years old. We need a young goalie with good potential...not a guy whose probably gonna retire in a couple seasons.
OrangeAndBlack
QUOTE (Retire#27 @ Aug 7 2008, 12:07 PM) *
Maybe Rolo + a massage table for Gagne, but not straight up.


Spa grade?

QUOTE (youngdaniel48 @ Aug 7 2008, 12:15 PM) *
i wouldnt do that...roloson is 38 years old. We need a young goalie with good potential...not a guy whose probably gonna retire in a couple seasons.


This
Brophy
lol, sarcasim friends.
Retire#27
QUOTE (youngdaniel48 @ Aug 7 2008, 12:15 PM) *
i wouldnt do that...roloson is 38 years old. We need a young goalie with good potential...not a guy whose probably gonna retire in a couple seasons.

I think he was joking (I hope).

QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 7 2008, 12:18 PM) *
Spa grade?

+ the West Edmonton Mall + a few barrels of oil.
youngdaniel48
QUOTE (Brophy @ Aug 7 2008, 12:24 PM) *
lol, sarcasim friends.


oh lol...well kinda hard to tell sarcasm without any hints towards it rolleyes.gif

hesh
It Roli not Rolo. Roli the Goalie. You know kinda like Ollie the Goalie(Olaf Kolzig). But yeah Dwayne is clearly washed up. Great guy though.
Retire#27
QUOTE (hesh @ Aug 7 2008, 01:57 PM) *
It Roli not Rolo. Roli the Goalie. You know kinda like Ollie the Goalie(Olaf Kolzig). But yeah Dwayne is clearly washed up. Great guy though.

I called him Rolo while he was in Minnesota, he's still Rolo to me.
OilerFan
QUOTE (FlyersGirl @ Aug 5 2008, 04:22 PM) *
If the Flyers traded Gagne they probably wouldn't have any interest in Penner or Cogs because the Flyers are fine at forward depth. They need defense above all else. I don't think the Oilers and Flyers would be an ideal match at this point.


I agree considering the immediate needs of both teams. Flyers would want someone the calibre of Souray, Visnovsky, Gilbert at this point in time for Gagne (who the Oilers would not likely give up at this point). Trouble is, no one at this point knows how Gagne is going to bounce back after his concussions. If he doesn't come back as expected they may try and move him in Feb and dump his 5.2M salary then they would probably consider a forward for forward trade.

QUOTE (hesh @ Aug 6 2008, 04:25 PM) *
Meh..... I guess. The oilers don't have much depth at D either.


We have lots of depth at D in some real good prospects, just not NHL ready D-men and that's what Philly needs.
OrangeAndBlack
QUOTE (Brophy @ Aug 7 2008, 12:24 PM) *
lol, sarcasim friends.


That's what is known as very dry humor. So dry only 1 person who read that knew you were joking.
OrangeAndBlack
QUOTE (Retire#27 @ Aug 7 2008, 12:25 PM) *
+ the West Edmonton Mall + a few barrels of oil.


I don't know. Commodities trading for hockey players is tricky business. On a Tuesday, 3 barrels of oil might fetch a Gagne, but on Wednesday it might only be worth an Upshall and a 6th round draft pick.
Retire#27
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 7 2008, 05:05 PM) *
I don't know. Commodities trading for hockey players is tricky business. On a Tuesday, 3 barrels of oil might fetch a Gagne, but on Wednesday it might only be worth an Upshall and a 6th round draft pick.

It's a risk you have to take if you're the GM. Sometimes you have to face tough choices, such as oil speculation, when you're making trades. It's part of the job.
pat
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 7 2008, 05:03 PM) *
That's what is known as very dry humor. So dry only 1 person who read that knew you were joking.

I knew he was joking as well, Brophy's no fool wink.gif
hesh
QUOTE (Retire#27 @ Aug 7 2008, 01:18 PM) *
I called him Rolo while he was in Minnesota, he's still Rolo to me.

When he came back to minnesota the year after the cup run people were chanting roli. I assumed it's always been his nickname.
OrangeAndBlack
We need a steel-cage grudge match to resolve this nickname dispute!
OilerFan
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 8 2008, 11:45 AM) *
We need a steel-cage grudge match to resolve this nickname dispute!

How about this...

In Edmonton its definitely "Roli"
In Minnesota it can be "Rolo"
OrangeAndBlack
D-Roll anyone?
Dave
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 9 2008, 07:30 AM) *
D-Roll anyone?


I'm feeling that one tongue.gif
FlyersGirl
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 8 2008, 01:45 PM) *
We need a steel-cage grudge match to resolve this nickname dispute!

I'm always down for that but of course it would be easier to just look at his mask. tongue.gif
OrangeAndBlack
QUOTE (FlyersGirl @ Aug 9 2008, 03:34 PM) *
I'm always down for that but of course it would be easier to just look at his mask. tongue.gif


This one?

hesh
Yeah that one.
bewareofBRIERE
yup its pretty straight forward right there
Retire#27


Or that one. I wasn't arguing what his nickname is or isn't/was or wasn't, I merely said he is Rolo to me.
OrangeAndBlack
That settles it. His nickname is "WE'TER"
hesh
QUOTE (OrangeAndBlack @ Aug 10 2008, 08:18 PM) *
That settles it. His nickname is "WE'TER"

laugh.gif
hesh
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 7 2008, 03:33 PM) *
We have lots of depth at D in some real good prospects, just not NHL ready D-men and that's what Philly needs.

I would argue edmonton has better prospects in Petry Chorney and Wild. I meant actual nhl defenseman. Not prospects.
PHI Flyers10
QUOTE (OilerFan @ Aug 4 2008, 08:50 PM) *
I sure am blink.gif Besides the "posting" limit question... how do people get to be advanced member ratings with under 200 posts????

I think I became an advanced member at like 30 posts or something rediculous like that.
Brophy
The admins arent ever here to change the rules.
Nick
I dont think Simon comes aviable ever really, he's a Flyer for life, even though he has had a consussion, he is still capable of 40 goals, regardless of who he plays with as he showed during the miserable 06/07 season with no one decent to play with. Simon in full form is easily in the top 10 of pure goal scorers in the leage
Andy
QUOTE (Nick @ Sep 1 2008, 01:48 PM) *
I dont think Simon comes aviable ever really, he's a Flyer for life, even though he has had a consussion, he is still capable of 40 goals, regardless of who he plays with as he showed during the miserable 06/07 season with no one decent to play with. Simon in full form is easily in the top 10 of pure goal scorers in the leage

I wish we could say that's true. But, the fact remains that no one can say for sure if Gagne will still be the player he was prior to the concussion until Gagne shows us that capability. And he actually suffered two concussions last season. First, the mild concussion, then came back, and suffered the other one that put him out for the season.
Flyersgal74
QUOTE (Andy @ Sep 1 2008, 04:36 PM) *
I wish we could say that's true. But, the fact remains that no one can say for sure if Gagne will still be the player he was prior to the concussion until Gagne shows us that capability. And he actually suffered two concussions last season. First, the mild concussion, then came back, and suffered the other one that put him out for the season.


Last year it was said by his Dr. that he only had one concussion. He came back too soon and was hit again and the symtoms returned.


"Simon Gagne done for the season? Bruins fans who saw Patrice Bergeron sidelined Oct. 27 by a Grade 3 concussion delivered by Flyer defenseman Randy Jones won't feel much empathy for the talented Flyer forward. But Gagne learned last week that he'll have to pack it in until next year, and revealed that the consulting doctor, James Kelly in Colorado, informed him that he did not suffer second and third concussions this year. In fact, said Gagne, Kelly told him he suffered only one concussion, on Oct. 24, when nailed by Florida's Jay Bouwmeester. The two other "concussions" were hits that aggravated the original concussion, which never healed."
hesh
QUOTE (Flyersgal74 @ Sep 1 2008, 04:39 PM) *
Last year it was said by his Dr. that he only had one concussion. He came back too soon and was hit again and the symtoms returned.


"Simon Gagne done for the season? Bruins fans who saw Patrice Bergeron sidelined Oct. 27 by a Grade 3 concussion delivered by Flyer defenseman Randy Jones won't feel much empathy for the talented Flyer forward. But Gagne learned last week that he'll have to pack it in until next year, and revealed that the consulting doctor, James Kelly in Colorado, informed him that he did not suffer second and third concussions this year. In fact, said Gagne, Kelly told him he suffered only one concussion, on Oct. 24, when nailed by Florida's Jay Bouwmeester. The two other "concussions" were hits that aggravated the original concussion, which never healed."

Which brings up another question. How do the Philadelphia flyers of all teams mistreat a concussion. With Primeau and Lindros having their careers ended because of it how can something like that happen? It's almost surreal that they bring him when they were in the playoffs at the time(I think).
Andy
QUOTE (Flyersgal74 @ Sep 1 2008, 05:39 PM) *
Last year it was said by his Dr. that he only had one concussion. He came back too soon and was hit again and the symtoms returned.

Yeah, I read that at the time, but I don't buy it. When you're hit, see stars, suffer concussion symptoms, then return when those symptoms seem to subside and another hit causes you to again see stars, and have recurring symptoms, chances are you've suffered multiple concussions. But it doesn't matter anyway. It still doesn't change the fact that no one can know if he's capable of returning to his previous form until he shows us he's capable.
Flyers1848
You don't know what to expect with Gagne, not because of his skill or potential, but because of the his concussions. You don't know how many games he'll play, this year, or in the same matter for the rest of his career. I like Gagne and I think if he can stay free from concussions he'll return to his old form, but concussions are things you don't play around with, so you never really know.
KlotzLover
QUOTE (Flyers1848 @ Sep 2 2008, 07:35 AM) *
You don't know what to expect with Gagne, not because of his skill or potential, but because of the his concussions. You don't know how many games he'll play, this year, or in the same matter for the rest of his career. I like Gagne and I think if he can stay free from concussions he'll return to his old form, but concussions are things you don't play around with, so you never really know.


Exactly. At this point in his career his mind has got to be a little weird and I'm more worried that all these concussions are going to his head. Like what happens if he snaps on ice and just about kills a player! I don't know, I just worry that Gagne will be a danger on ice these days. Like I agree, I really like Gagne as a Flyer fan and as a person but I just worry about his health and start to think that he should hang up the skates for his own well - being.

But I guess Gagne knows his body his best and I trust that he'll know when to stop.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.